Data

TML report for ACEA finds uneven progress across EU e-mobility

Cover graphic of the Transport & Mobility Leuven quarterly monitoring report for Q3 2026, published by ACEA on 12 November 2026. AI-generated illustration.
Cover graphic of the Transport & Mobility Leuven quarterly monitoring report for Q3 2026, published by ACEA on 12 November 2026. AI-generated illustration.
ACEA has published a summary of a new monitoring report by Transport & Mobility Leuven (TML) on Europe's electric vehicle ecosystem, dated 12 November 2026. The message is blunt: the transition keeps moving, but "significant disparities in vehicle uptake, infrastructure readiness and industrial competitiveness risk undermining progress towards the EU's 2030 targets". The summary does give the hard numbers at EU level and the spread between the best and worst member states — but no per-country table, so the charging-database figures and the worked cost example further down are ours.

What the report actually covers

TML groups the problem into three headings. Vehicle uptake is the share of new cars that plug in. Infrastructure readiness is whether there is a charger where people drive and park, at a price they can live with. Industrial competitiveness is whether European factories, battery supply and the supplier base can hold position against Chinese and American competition.

The headline figure is not marginal. According to TML's Q3 2026 monitoring report, as summarised by ACEA on 12 November 2026, zero-emission vehicles accounted for 23% of new passenger car registrations across the EU in the first nine months of 2026. The same report puts national market shares above 50% in some member states while they remain below 10% in others. That is the spread the whole analysis rests on: one union, one average, and a gap of more than forty percentage points between the front and the back of the field.

None of those three headings is a new topic. What the report adds is the claim that they are drifting apart, and that a slow dimension can drag the fast ones down. A country with generous purchase incentives and thin charging coverage will still sell cars, but the owners will be unhappy. A country with good chargers and no affordable models will not.

Charging: 483 locations in our database

Our own supercharger database currently tracks 483 locations across Europe, each with a recorded price per kWh. That is a working sample, not a census of the continent's public network. It is still enough to show the part of "infrastructure readiness" that drivers feel most directly: the price on the post varies far more than the connector type does.

The cheapest locations in the database and the priciest ones are not separated by a rounding error. They are separated by the kind of tariff structure you are standing in front of, which is why the same car can cost twice as much to run in two neighbouring regions. Infrastructure readiness, in that sense, is not only about counting plugs.

A worked cost example

Take a compact family EV using 18 kWh per 100 km. On home charging at €0.25/kWh that is €4.50 per 100 km (18 × 0.25 = 4.50). On a DC fast charger at €0.55/kWh it is €9.90 per 100 km (18 × 0.55 = 9.90).

A petrol car at 6.5 l/100 km and €1.50 per litre lands at €9.75 per 100 km (6.5 × 1.50 = 9.75). So home charging costs less than half of what petrol does — €4.50 against €9.75 — while public fast charging lands within a few cents of petrol: €9.90 against €9.75. That single split explains most of the anecdotal disagreement about running costs, and you can plug your own tariffs into our charging cost calculator to see where your car sits.

Range matters here too. A car that loses a fifth of its WLTP figure in January will need more charging stops, and every stop is billed at the higher public rate. Our real-world range tool, built on Bjørn Nyland's third-party real-world measurements, is the honest check against the brochure number.

Industry: the third leg

The competitiveness chapter is the one European readers should watch most closely, because it is the hardest to fix with a subsidy. Battery cell production, cathode supply and the cost of energy all sit upstream of the showroom price. TML's point, as summarised by ACEA, is that without a competitive industrial base the other two dimensions eventually stall.

Outside Europe the same question is being answered with different tools. We reported in September on Egypt's plan to build 100,000 electric cars a year, an industrial policy built on assembly for the domestic market rather than export. Saudi Arabia is taking a similar route with the Lucid Cosmos, scheduled for production from the second half of 2027. Neither is a European comparison, but both show how much of the cost curve is set outside the EU.

What a buyer should check this month

Reports like this one rarely change a purchase decision. Charging behaviour does. Three practical checks, in order:

One. Find out what your home tariff would be overnight, not what the headline domestic rate is. The €4.50 per 100 km example above depends entirely on that number.

Two. Look at the chargers on your regular routes, not the ones near the showroom. Our charging station map and the cheapest-location list are updated from the same database.

Three. Check the real consumption of the specific model before comparing it to a rival. The EV catalog holds 67 models with full specifications, so the comparison is at least between comparable cars.

The public text gives the 23% EU average and the above 50% / below 10% spread, but it does not publish the per-country scores or the list of which states fall where. That detail sits with TML, and it is where the next round of the debate will be fought — because a union average of 23% tells you the direction of travel, not how far the slowest markets still have to run to reach it.

Source: https://www.acea.auto/news/new-report-reveals-uneven-progress-across-europes-electric-vehicle-ecosystem/

Discussion

No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts.